Oregon law on minors dating Gratis seks
in which the victim’s lack of consent was due solely to incapacity to consent by reason of being less than a specified age, it is a defense that the actor was less than three years older than the victim at the time of the alleged offense if the victim was at least 15 years of age at the time of the alleged offense. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.
[1971 c.743 §108; 1991 c.386 §3; 1991 c.830 §4; 1999 c.626 §24; amendments by 1999 c.626 §45 repealed by 2001 c.884 §1] Age difference of less than three years is not defense where victim does not give actual consent.
in which the victim’s lack of consent was due solely to incapacity to consent by reason of being less than a specified age, it is a defense that the actor was less than three years older than the victim at the time of the alleged offense. Aragorn, 189 Or App 65, 73 P3d 939 (2003), Sup Ct review denied Under evidence that defendant intentionally touched victim’s buttocks through clothing, whether such conduct constituted “sexual contact” of victim’s “intimate parts” was question for jury. Buller, 31 Or App 889, 5 (1977) Genitalia and breasts are intimate parts as matter of law under this section, and undeveloped genitalia and breasts of children are included within definition. Turner, 33 Or App 157, 5 (1978), Sup Ct review denied Rule that state is not permitted to introduce evidence of other crimes or bad acts solely to prove defendant acted as on prior occasions is strictly applied in sex crime cases, even those involving deviate sexual behavior, in so far as conduct with persons other than victim is concerned. Sicks, 33 Or App 435, 576 P2d 834 (1978) 51 OLR 428, 518-522, 555 (1972) Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Statutes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 163, https:// (2017) (last accessed Mar. Oregon assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections.
, when the object used to commit the unlawful sexual penetration was the hand or any part thereof of the actor and in which the victim’s lack of consent was due solely to incapacity to consent by reason of being less than a specified age, it is a defense that the actor was less than three years older than the victim at the time of the alleged offense. Kitt, 129 Or App 591, 8 (1994) Adult charged as accomplice or with inchoate crime does not obtain defense solely by reason that defense would be available to minor contemplated as having committed underlying conduct. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text.
Therefore, a 20 year old who has sex with a 17 year old (if over 3 years difference, even just 3 years and a day) is guilty of registerable sex felony, and he faces more time in custody than a 19 year old who is charged with rape III for having sex with a 14.
But they didn't have permission in, perhaps, a date-rape type situation. If no consent, but no force, then it was sex abuse II.
However, in a case out of Washington County called State v Stamper, the Oregon Court of Appeals held that sex abuse II didn't just apply to cases where the victim didn't consent.
In fact, given the text of the statutes, a 14 or 15-year old could have sex with a 12-year old if it was consensual.
However, for cases of sexual misconduct, the alleged victim must be at least 15 years old for defendants to claim ORS 163.345 as a defense. It is a common misconception that consensual sex of two people under 18 is legal.It is not actually ; the law providing criminal charges for Rape II and Rape III are broad and clear – it is illegal.